As we don't initialize all talloc contects of libmsc, let's make
sure that there is nothing left in the NULL context after the
unit test execution is finished.
Change-Id: I99fd82750aff376e4d90eaa2402ec41f4d59ef86
A memleak has been noticed after executing some of TTCN-3 test
cases. For example, the following ones:
- MSC_Tests.TC_lu_and_mo_sms,
- MSC_Tests.TC_lu_and_mt_sms.
The key point is that MSC_Tests.TC_lu_and_mo_sms basically sends
a MO SMS to a non-attached subscriber with MSISDN 12345, so this
message is getting stored in the SMSC's database.
As soon as the SMSC's queue is triggered, sms_submit_pending() would
retrieve pending messages from the database by calling function
smsq_take_next_sms() in loop and attempt to deliver them.
This function in it's turn checks whether the subscriber is attached
or not. If not, the allocated 'gsm_sms' structure would not be
free()ed! Therefore, every time smsq_take_next_sms() is called,
one 'gsm_sms' structure for an unattached subscriber is leaked.
Furthermore, there is a unit test called 'sms_queue_test', that
actually does cover smsq_take_next_sms() and was designed to
catch some potential memory leaks, but...
In order to avoid emulating the low-level SQLite API, the unit
test by design overwrites some functions of libmsc, including
db_sms_get_next_unsent_rr_msisdn(), that is being called by
smsq_take_next_sms().
The problem is that the original function in libmsc does
allocate a 'gsm_sms' structure on heap (using talloc), while
the overwriting function did this statically, returning a
pointer to stack. This critical difference made it impossible
to spot the memleak in smsq_take_next_sms() during the
unit test execution.
Let's refactor 'sms_queue_test' to use dynamic memory allocation,
and finally fix the evil memleak in smsq_take_next_sms().
Change-Id: Iad5e4d84d8d410ea43d5907e9ddf6e5fdb55bc7a
Closes: OS#3860
Add an SGs interface (3GPP TS 29.118) to osmo-msc in order to support
SMS tunneling and Circuit Switched Fallback (CSFB)
Change-Id: I73359925fc1ca72b33a1466e6ac41307f2f0b11d
Related: OS#3615
gsm_subscriber.h contains some legacy cruft, part of which is that the VLR's
max MSISDN length should rather be defined in vlr.h. Same for GSM_NAME_LENGTH
-> VLR_NAME_LENGTH.
Adjust some sms_queue stuff that anyway includes vlr.h already.
Drop gsm_subscriber.h from vlr.h.
Add other (more concise) includes that thus become necessary, since the include
chain vlr.h->gsm_subscriber.h->gsm_data.h is no longer in place.
Change-Id: Iab5c507ec04fc2884187cf946f6ae2240e4a31f8
Since the logging allocations now also show up in the root context report, some
tests need adjusted talloc checks.
In msc_vlr_tests, also output the number of talloc blocks before tests are
started to show that the number didn't change after the tests.
Change-Id: Iae07ae60230c7bab28e52b5df97fa3844778158e
We don't usually put space before in-place increment or decrement. Let's
make code look similar to other Osmocom projects.
Change-Id: I5962431ad16c97e412939dc1b8949f6361a5c26e
To avoid sanitizer build failures, ensure that the talloc contexts are empty
when done and free them.
Separate the msgb context from the overall talloc context for clarity: if
nested, the outer one would contain two blocks.
Change the "sms_queue_test" context from 1 byte to 0 in order to get a size of
zero in the end.
Change-Id: If08ba48ab9c28bf3c2db4014837c1304cec04aaf
Original libvlr code is by Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
polished and tweaked by Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de>.
This is a long series of trial-and-error development collapsed in one patch.
This may be split in smaller commits if reviewers prefer that. If we can keep
it as one, we have saved ourselves the additional separation work.
SMS:
The SQL based lookup of SMS for attached subscribers no longer works since the
SQL database no longer has the subscriber data. Replace with a round-robin on
the SMS recipient MSISDNs paired with a VLR subscriber RAM lookup whether the
subscriber is currently attached.
If there are many SMS for not-attached subscribers in the SMS database, this
will become inefficient: a DB hit returns a pending SMS, the RAM lookup will
reveal that the subscriber is not attached, after which the DB is hit for the
next SMS. It would become more efficient e.g. by having an MSISDN based hash
list for the VLR subscribers and by marking non-attached SMS recipients in the
SMS database so that they can be excluded with the SQL query already.
There is a sanity limit to do at most 100 db hits per attempt to find a pending
SMS. So if there are more than 100 stored SMS waiting for their recipients to
actually attach to the MSC, it may take more than one SMS queue trigger to
deliver SMS for subscribers that are actually attached.
This is not very beautiful, but is merely intended to carry us over to a time
when we have a proper separate SMSC entity.
Introduce gsm_subscriber_connection ref-counting in libmsc.
Remove/Disable VTY and CTRL commands to create subscribers, which is now a task
of the OsmoHLR. Adjust the python tests accordingly.
Remove VTY cmd subscriber-keep-in-ram.
Use OSMO_GSUP_PORT = 4222 instead of 2222. See
I4222e21686c823985be8ff1f16b1182be8ad6175.
So far use the LAC from conn->bts, will be replaced by conn->lac in
Id3705236350d5f69e447046b0a764bbabc3d493c.
Related: OS#1592 OS#1974
Change-Id: I639544a6cdda77a3aafc4e3446a55393f60e4050
Vadim Yanitskiy
Harald Welte