diff --git a/da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc b/da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc
index 98116f4e..76716719 100644
--- a/da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc
+++ b/da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc
@@ -88,6 +88,24 @@
       "revId": "da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc",
       "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
     },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "c974108c_a1eacc3b",
+        "filename": "include/osmocom/hlr/hlr_sms.h",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 17,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 1000230
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2023-09-18T18:29:54Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "The existing euse_del() and ussd_route_del() functions don\u0027t have those \"free\" semantics you just stated: instead they require the pointer to be valid (not NULL) and they perform the llist_del() step (unlinking from the global lists of EUSEs and USSD routes) before the final talloc_free(). My new smsc_del() and smsc_route_del() functions are exactly the same.",
+      "parentUuid": "c3f853fa_dd6d58db",
+      "revId": "da05bc066ebc94eda14dfcf364a30e50211010bc",
+      "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
+    },
     {
       "unresolved": true,
       "key": {