Processes created have the scope of the test, so we should store
everything in a per-suite_run/per-test directory, otherwise everything
is stored in the same trial run_dir directory and it's really messy.
Change-Id: I06be2dd21710e14c1337d13b1fe6c2f68f037957
With the recent fix of the junit report related issues, another issue arose:
the 'with log.Origin' was changed to disallow __enter__ing an object twice to
fix problems, now still code would fail because it tries to do 'with' on the
same object twice. The only reason is to ensure that logging is associated with
a given object. Instead of complicating even more, implement differently.
Refactor logging to simplify use: drop the 'with Origin' style completely, and
instead use the python stack to determine which objects are created by which,
and which object to associate a log statement with.
The new way: we rely on the convention that each class instance has a local
'self' referencing the object instance. If we need to find an origin as a new
object's parent, or to associate a log message with, we traverse each stack
frame, fetching the first local 'self' object that is a log.Origin class
instance.
How to use:
Simply call log.log() anywhere, and it finds an Origin object to log for, from
the stack. Alternatively call self.log() for any Origin() object to skip the
lookup.
Create classes as child class of log.Origin and make sure to call
super().__init__(category, name). This constructor will magically find a parent
Origin on the stack.
When an exception happens, we first escalate the exception up through call
scopes to where ever it is handled by log.log_exn(). This then finds an Origin
object in the traceback's stack frames, no need to nest in 'with' scopes.
Hence the 'with log.Origin' now "happens implicitly", we can write pure natural
python code, no more hassles with scope ordering.
Furthermore, any frame can place additional logging information in a frame by
calling log.ctx(). This is automatically inserted in the ancestry associated
with a log statement / exception.
Change-Id: I5f9b53150f2bb6fa9d63ce27f0806f0ca6a45e90
In db59bcf9fc we added a configured GSUP server
address for the osmo-hlr, but the osmo-msc is still trying to connect to
127.0.0.1.
In the same way as for mgcpgw, add conf_for_msc() to OsmoHLR, and use that to
configure the HLR's address in osmo-msc.cfg.
Related: OS#2320
Change-Id: I005aa160c679fc92b248abd762888959bd5b2c55
The "Affero" nature makes sense for the Osmocom network components like
BSC, SGSN, etc. as they are typically operated to provide a network
service.
For testing, this doesn't make so much sense as it is difficult to
imagine people creating a business out of offering to run test cases on
an end-to-end Osmocom GSM network. So let's drop the 'Affero' here.
All code is so far developed by sysmocom staff, so as Managing Director
of sysmocom I can effect such a license change unilaterally.
Change-Id: I8959c2d605854ffdc21cb29c0fe0e715685c4c05
Pau Espin
Neels Hofmeyr
Harald Welte