As a side effect, we have to sacrifice a unit test (TC_inval_dummy)
because it becomes impossible to pass a dummy or invalid SACCH block
to lchan_bs_pwr_ctrl().
Change-Id: I937117cf26fb718d57920382f6972390ad498c51
Related: SYS#4918
Let's split all lchan and power_control specific stuff into their own headers,
it helps finding out data and operations available related to them.
We already have similar classification in osmo-bsc.
Change-Id: I6424dcbd2e329fc1a516f8886359554ed7e9487e
This commit extends existing MS Power Control Loop algorithm to take
into account computed C/I values on the UL, received from MS. The
related C/I parameters used by the algorithm are configured at and
provided by the BSC, which transmits them to the BTS similar to already
existing parameters.
Using C/I instead of existing RxQual is preferred due to extended
granularity of C/I (bigger range than RxQual's 0-7).
Furthermore, existing literature (such as "GSM/EDGE: Evolution and Performance"
Table 10.3) provides detailed information about expected target values,
even different values for different channel types. Hence, it was decided
to support setting different MS Power Parameters for different channel
types.
These MS Power Parameters are Osmocom specific, ie. supported only by
newish versions of osmo-bts. Older versions of osmo-bts should ignore
the new IEs added just fine. The new IEs containing the MS POwer
Parameters are not send for non osmo-bts BTSs, hence this commit is
secure with regards to running osmo-bsc against an ip.access BTS such
as nanoBTS.
Related: SYS#4917
Depends: libosmocore.git Change-Id Iffef0611430ad6c90606149c398d80158633bbca
Change-Id: I5dfd8ff9ab6b499646498b507624758dcc160fb6
It makes more sense to use a reduce step size that is smaller than
the increase step size. This way both MS/BS power control loops
would be able to react quickly of the signal gets weaker, while
the good signal would not trigger radical power reduction.
Change-Id: Ie358fd828a68bfa1d23559197e8df8478fb4535e
Related: SYS#4918
We already have MS Power Control, which according to 3GPP 45.008
shall be implemented in the MS to minimize the transmit power in
the Uplink direction. The BS Power Control may optionally be
implemented by the network side for the same purpose.
Using Downlink signal measurements reported by the MS, the BSS
(either BSC, or BTS) may control Downlink attenuation in a way
that the transmit power remains as low as possible, or remains
in a specific range corresponding to good RxLev values on the
MS side. This change implements autonomous BS Power Control,
that can optionally be enabled by the BSC.
BS Power Control re-uses parts of the MS Power Control code,
so all parameters can be configured in the same way - via the
VTY interface or a configuration file. This basically means
that features like hysteresis and EWMA based filtering are
also available for BS Power Control.
The only difference is that RxQual values higher than 0 would
trigger the logic to reduce the current attenuation twice.
Note that one of the unit tests ('TC_rxlev_max_min') fails,
as the power step limitations for raising and lowering look
wrong to me, and the related discussion is still ongoing.
Change-Id: I5b509e71d5f668b6b8b2abf8053c27f2a7c78451
Related: SYS#4918
MS uplink power control is required in pretty much any BTS, and we
cannot assume that they PHY / L1 will always take care of it by
itself. So the correspondign code is moved to common/power_control.c
and called from the generic part of L1SAP.
The corresponding VTY paramter has been moved from the sysmobts-specific
trx VTY node to the common BTS VTY node.
Vadim Yanitskiy
Pau Espin
Harald Welte