This unit test demonstrates a problem in amr_parse_mr_conf(): the
threshold and hysteresis values are parsed incorrectly. They are
expected to match what we have in amr_fr_bts_mode_def[]:
Mode[0] = 0/13/4
Mode[1] = 2/25/4
Mode[2] = 5/37/4
This will be fixed in a follow-up patch.
Change-Id: Iab7e8878e62f598959e80fcb7e729b7f496962a2
Related: SYS#5917, OS#4984
The AMR transmission phase directly depends on the frame number. The
transmission phase is used to tell if a received AMR frame contains a
CMI (frame type that is currently used) or CMR (frame type that the
receiver should use) codec identifier. The formulas in the present
implementation seem to be correct but they do not reflect the numbers in
the spec very well, nor do they have unit-tests. Lets replace them with
more readble functions and test those functions with unit-tests.
Change-Id: I94a934a6b3b397b4cd0e9da3577325de58814335
Related: SYS#5549
We already have MS Power Control, which according to 3GPP 45.008
shall be implemented in the MS to minimize the transmit power in
the Uplink direction. The BS Power Control may optionally be
implemented by the network side for the same purpose.
Using Downlink signal measurements reported by the MS, the BSS
(either BSC, or BTS) may control Downlink attenuation in a way
that the transmit power remains as low as possible, or remains
in a specific range corresponding to good RxLev values on the
MS side. This change implements autonomous BS Power Control,
that can optionally be enabled by the BSC.
BS Power Control re-uses parts of the MS Power Control code,
so all parameters can be configured in the same way - via the
VTY interface or a configuration file. This basically means
that features like hysteresis and EWMA based filtering are
also available for BS Power Control.
The only difference is that RxQual values higher than 0 would
trigger the logic to reduce the current attenuation twice.
Note that one of the unit tests ('TC_rxlev_max_min') fails,
as the power step limitations for raising and lowering look
wrong to me, and the related discussion is still ongoing.
Change-Id: I5b509e71d5f668b6b8b2abf8053c27f2a7c78451
Related: SYS#4918
The timing advance controller that is implemented in loops.c of
osmo-bts-trx only works for osmo-bts-trx and not for any of the phy
based bts. Lets move the timing advance controller into the common part
and make it available for every bts. Also lets add a unit-test.
Change-Id: If7ddf74db3abc9b9872abe620a0aeebe3327e70a
Related: SYS#4567
There's nothing sysmobts specific in this test so let's move it into
separate directory and run unconditionally. The test itself is unaltered
except for intro text.
Change-Id: I0d1957cd9cf5497826be095c7a42b7bb4fa10397
Related: OS#2223
The end of the measurement reporting period is not aligned with the
SACCH block where the results are reported. The tables that are
used to detect the end of the measurement period are therefore
wrong. The frame number of the SACCH block must be used and not the
TDMA frame number (modulo 104) of the measurement reporing interval.
The tables are oriented to the frame number of the first SACCH block,
at the beginning of an interval. However, when a SACCH block is received
it will always contain the result of the recently passed measurement
reporting period.
To match the tables, introduce another lookup table to remap each
SACCH block that ends to the matching beginning block number.
Change-Id: I1eef894e6f15b4449fc8926bebb118624efc7924
After switching to libosmocoding there's no need in low-level bursts
test which is part of libosmocoding anyway.
Change-Id: Icb8caf62ac653a39a7a82f2225e8edeab7f5afb5
This tests the computations of the tx_power.c code using sysmoBTS 1002,
1020, 1100 and 2050 values, as well as the power ramping code.
Change-Id: I1cc88d4c6edff326e2e67d4f869aa02c9b2b1ac5
Limit the range from 0 to (_MAX_SYSINFO_TYPE - 1) instead of
0 to 31. This way we will never access the lchan->si.buf[] out
of bounds. This is only a theoretical issue though as the code
filling the lchan->si.buf for the SACCH will not have valid
>= _MAX_SYSINFO_TYPE. Add a small regression test to check we
still schedule all SIs.
Fixes: CID 1040765
The first test checks the AGCH may queue length computation.
The second test fills the queue by calling bts_agch_enqueue() with a
mix of IMM.ASS and IMM.ASS.REJ. Then it drains the queue by calling
bts_ccch_copy_msg(). After each of both steps, statistics are printed
out.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
When cross-compiling osmo-bts/osmo-pcu one can not easily
execute the testsuite. By adding the OSMO_QEMU variable in
front of the normal execution we can execute the tests. This
should work for native and cross builds.
$ OSMO_QEMU="qemu-arm -L /opt/poky/1.1.2/sysroots/armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi/" make check
This was found and debugged by Sylvain. The BTS will always support
A5/0 so we do not keep track of that, the first bit of the flags is
used for A5/1, second for A5/2... but for RSL there is an offset to
go from RSL to A5(x). Add a testcase and change the code.
Check that adding a paging command works, check that it is expired
after the first call to paging_gen_msg. The test will be extended
to test the scheduling and selection of the various paging messages.
Vadim Yanitskiy
Philipp Maier
Max
Harald Welte