39 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
39 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
# If both a static and a dynamic TCH/H (even without pchan switch!) are available, we always prefer static TS.
|
|
create-bts trx-count 1 timeslots c+s4 dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H PDCH
|
|
|
|
network
|
|
bts 0
|
|
channel allocator mode set-all ascending
|
|
|
|
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
|
|
|
|
# the dynamic timeslot is already in TCH/H mode, and needs no pchan switch. It appears first in the list, hence it would
|
|
# be used first -- but we prefer using static TS when still available:
|
|
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
|
|
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
|
|
# ^
|
|
|
|
# Interference ratings do NOT influence whether a static or dynamic lchan (even without pchan switch) is going to be
|
|
# assigned.
|
|
network
|
|
bts 0
|
|
channel allocator avoid-interference 1
|
|
interference-meas level-bounds -115 -109 -103 -97 -91 -85
|
|
# 0 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
|
# Here the dyn TS lchan happens to have less interference. But still the choice to prefer static over dynamic weighs
|
|
# stronger. The static TS with least interference is picked.
|
|
# dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H dyn TCH/H
|
|
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
|
|
res-ind trx 0 0 levels - 4- -- 1- 4- 3- 2- -
|
|
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
|
|
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/HH *
|
|
# ^
|
|
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
|
|
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
|
|
# ^
|
|
# now only dynamic TS are left. The one dyn lchan with least interference is picked
|
|
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
|
|
expect-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
|
|
# ^
|