Since b7ef6884f9, the state is updated
before triggering the signal S_NM_STATECHG, so the warning does no
longer hold true.
Change-Id: I7b7dd30b4fcdc92febca42e3e6a75e6f98e184ff
There's no need to use pointers there, it is only asking for errors from
code handling the data structe from the signal by attempting to change
them. Even for mem size point of view it doesn't make sense, since it's
3 byte vs a 4 byte pointer.
Furthermore, this is a preparation for new commit, where the NM object
current state will be updated before emitting the signal. This patch
eases a lot the follow up mentioned patch.
Change-Id: I9b648dfd8392b7b40bfe2b38f3345017481f5129
This makes sure code accessing those fields is not changing its values,
since it would make no sense to change those. Follow up commit will make
convert those pointers to be full structs instead, as there's no need to
have pointers there.
Change-Id: I9979e62eac861e25bbe2161ab187ddb2b40fd097
Its name is totally misleading, since they seem to be related to
GetAttributes messages rather than SetAttributes.
Change-Id: I306cb407dbd9b98e301b5d93046bdadcb466b82b
The VTY defun already indicates BSC_VTY_ATTR_RESTART_ABIS_OML_LINK
correctly, but so far we would immediately start using the new values
internally, and wrongly interpret interference levels. Fix that.
Have bts->interf_meas_params twice: interf_meas_params_cfg for the VTY
configured values, and interf_meas_params_used for the values that the
BTS actually knows about, after they were sent via OML.
In a running BSC, when changing the interference level boundaries on the
telnet VTY, the BTS is not immediately told about the change. That would
require a BTS restart. Hence store the cfg values separately in
interf_meas_params_cfg. For comparing/printing interference levels in a
running BTS, only employ the values that were actually sent via OML and
placed in interf_meas_params_used.
Related: SYS#5313
Change-Id: Iad8cf4151ff7f86dc0549158ed5d91d788d40b1f
This is needed in order to to proper feature support verification for
IPv6 when configuring the NSVC.
Before this patch, there could be a race condition where NSVC FSM
checked for BTS feature BTS_FEAT_IPV6_NSVC before it was negotiated
through BTS Get Attributes (Ack).
Fixes: OS#4870
Change-Id: I7c207eee0e331995ae04acec014fbd13d4d16280
Before this patch, Get Attributes was sent quicklyafter the OML link
became up, even if the BTS/BB_TRANSC objects were still powered off,
which is wrong since attributes should only be available after the
objects transition out of the Power off state.
Furthermore, information about get attr response already received will
be required in future patches to delay NSVC setting.
Related: OS#4870
Change-Id: I8ec39c7e1f956ffce9aecd58a5590c43200ba086
The only real 1-1 relationship between BTS NM objects is the one between
GPRS Cell and BTS (which is actually a BTS cell).
In our current osmo-bts implementation we don't care much since we only
handle 1-cell BTSses, but let's make the data structure organization
more generic.
Implementation notes:
The gsm_bts_sm is moved to its own file, APIs to allocate are added and
the new public object is hooked correctly in the allocation process of
osmo-bsc.
Change-Id: I06461b7784fa2a78de37383406e35beae85fbad8
Older osmo-bts versions (before FSMs) tended to mimic broken behavior
from nanoBTS. As so, we detect it because SiteMGr becomes Enabled by
default as in nanoBTS, and hence we can manage them also by expecting no
Offline state and sending Opstart (and hence finally transitting to
Enabled) during Dependency state.
Change-Id: Iaa036a2936f609b9b9721b2b4ad8d6deaf023f42
Pau Espin
Philipp Maier
Neels Hofmeyr
Vadim Yanitskiy