hide the "smscb-command" vty command; people should use osmo-cbc
Many years prior to the implementation of osmo-cbc, we introduced a way how raw RSL SMSCB COMMANMD can be injected from the VTY. These days, people should use the CBSP interface with osmo-cbc or any other CBC. We should not advertise the VTY command hack as a standard feature anymore. Change-Id: If5ddc3db989763a1f47d4cbc026e293e3134d8ef Related: OS#4753
This commit is contained in:
parent
ea8d6939e6
commit
c72c853a96
|
@ -5796,8 +5796,9 @@ DEFUN(bts_resend_power_ctrl_params,
|
|||
return CMD_SUCCESS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DEFUN(smscb_cmd, smscb_cmd_cmd,
|
||||
/* this command is now hidden, as it's a low-level debug hack, and people should
|
||||
* instead use osmo-cbc these days */
|
||||
DEFUN_HIDDEN(smscb_cmd, smscb_cmd_cmd,
|
||||
"bts <0-255> smscb-command (normal|schedule|default) <1-4> HEXSTRING",
|
||||
"BTS related commands\n" BTS_NR_STR
|
||||
"SMS Cell Broadcast\n"
|
||||
|
@ -5861,6 +5862,7 @@ DEFUN(smscb_cmd, smscb_cmd_cmd,
|
|||
return CMD_WARNING;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* SDCCH4 might not be correct here if the CBCH is on a SDCCH8? */
|
||||
rsl_sms_cb_command(bts, RSL_CHAN_SDCCH4_ACCH, cb_cmd, false, buf, rc);
|
||||
|
||||
return CMD_SUCCESS;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue