parent
1a79d36440
commit
a5312fdd2b
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ |
||||
Ideas about a handover algorithm |
||||
====================================================================== |
||||
|
||||
This is mostly based on the results presented in Chapter 8 of "Performance |
||||
Enhancements in a Frequency Hopping GSM Network" by Thomas Toftegaard Nielsen |
||||
and Joeroen Wigard. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== Reasons for performing handover === |
||||
|
||||
Section 2.1.1: Handover used in their CAPACITY simulation: |
||||
|
||||
1) Interference Handover |
||||
|
||||
Average RXLEV is satisfactory high, but average RXQUAL too low indicates |
||||
interference to the channel. Handover should be made. |
||||
|
||||
2) Bad Quality |
||||
|
||||
Averaged RXQUAL is lower than a threshold |
||||
|
||||
3) Low Level / Signal Strength |
||||
|
||||
Average RXLEV is lower than a threshold |
||||
|
||||
4) Distance Handover |
||||
|
||||
MS is too far away from a cell (measured by TA) |
||||
|
||||
5) Power budget / Better Cell |
||||
|
||||
RX Level of neighbor cell is at least "HO Margin dB" dB better than the |
||||
current serving cell. |
||||
|
||||
=== Ideal parameters for HO algorithm === |
||||
|
||||
Chapter 8, Section 2.2, Table 24: |
||||
|
||||
Window RXLEV averaging: 10 SACCH frames (no weighting) |
||||
Window RXQUAL averaging: 1 SACCH frame (no averaging) |
||||
Level Threashold: 1 of the last 1 AV-RXLEV values < -110dBm |
||||
Quality Threshold: 3 of the last 4 AV-RXQUAL values >= 5 |
||||
Interference Threshold: 1 of the last AV-RXLEV > -85 dBm & |
||||
3 of the last 4 AV-RXQUAL values >= 5 |
||||
Power Budget: Level of neighbor cell > 3 dB better |
||||
Power Budget Interval: Every 6 SACCH frames (6 seconds ?!?) |
||||
Distance Handover: Disabled |
||||
Evaluation rule 1: RXLEV of the candidate cell a tleast -104 dBm |
||||
Evaluation rule 2: Level of candidate cell > 3dB better own cell |
||||
Timer Successful HO: 5 SACCH frames |
||||
Timer Unsuccessful HO: 1 SACCH frame |
||||
|
||||
In a non-frequency hopping case, RXQUAL threshold can be decreased to |
||||
RXLEV >= 4 |
||||
|
||||
When frequency hopping is enabled, the following additional parameters |
||||
should be introduced: |
||||
|
||||
* No intra-cell handover |
||||
* Use a HO Margin of 2dB |
||||
|
||||
=== Handover Channel Reservation === |
||||
|
||||
In loaded network, each cell should reserve some channels for handovers, |
||||
rather than using all of them for new call establishment. This reduces the |
||||
need to drop calls due to failing handovers, at the expense of failing new call |
||||
attempts. |
||||
|
||||
=== Dynamic HO Margin === |
||||
|
||||
The handover margin (hysteresis) should depend on the RXQUAL. Optimal results |
||||
were achieved with the following settings: |
||||
* RXQUAL <= 4: 9 dB |
||||
* RXQUAL == 5: 6 dB |
||||
* RXQUAL >= 6: 1 dB |
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue